Blog Archives

Chief Justice John Roberts on hacking through the jungle of a bad brief with a machete

In the following interview, Chief Justice John Roberts contrasts reading a bad brief, which he likens to hacking through a jungle with a machete in an attempt to get to the point, with reading a good brief, which allows the

Posted in Uncategorized

A great response to grammar Nazis from Stephen Fry

OK so we all make grammar mistakes. We type “its” rather than “it’s.” But we cringe when a bus drives by with Blue Cross/Blue Shield’s latest slogan “Live Fearless!”  It’s like fingernails on a chalkboard. In her book Eats, Shoots

Posted in Uncategorized

What are the chances that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will grant allocatur?

Prospective clients often ask me about the statistical possibility of being heard by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.  I typically tell them that the likelihood of being heard is remote.  In 2011, the court received 2,363 petitions and granted only 101. 

Posted in Uncategorized

Seek reversal? Request oral argument.

Although the Superior Court affirms over 80% of the time, the statistics show an increased percentage of reversals in cases argued before the assigned panel. For each of the calendar years 2007 – 2011, roughly 10% of the cases submitted

Posted in Uncategorized

Raising ineffective assistance of counsel issues on direct appeal

Question: In a direct criminal appeal, can a defendant raise the issue that his trial counsel did not provide effective assistance of counsel? Answer: For now at least, the answer is generally “No.” In Commonwealth v. Grant, 813 A.2d 726

Posted in Uncategorized

History of legal briefs

Years ago I had the opportunity to watch oral argument in a contract case in the Court of Appeals in London. The argument went on all morning.  Then the judges broke for lunch and announced their intent to return for

Posted in Uncategorized

The Comic Book Brief

“One picture is worth ten thousand words.” This familiar maxim was coined (according to the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations) by Frederick R. Barnard, in the publication “Printers Ink” on March 10, 1927. It is not a Chinese proverb. It is,

Posted in Uncategorized

Block Quotations – Use Sparingly

Why use sparingly? Many Readers dislike visual impact—requires shift to shorter line length Surveys show judges and staff attorneys tend to skip over quotes more than six or seven lines in length Judges view them as evidence of laziness When

Posted in Uncategorized

Argument in Statements of Facts

Appellate advocates regularly wrestle with the task of presenting the facts of a case in a light most favorable to a client without engaging in “argument.” Although there is no bright line separating “argument” from effective advocacy, a review of

Posted in Uncategorized

Effective Use of Headings

The effective use of headings not only organizes the arguments but also assists the reader who loses the thread to get back on track.  Briefs are boring.  Headings allow a reader who loses concentration and dozes off in the middle

Posted in Uncategorized

To blog of legalese

“The time has come,” the lawyer said,
“To blog of legalese:
Of headings—and quotes—and citations—
Of orders and decrees—
And why law prose is frightfully dull—
And whether the brief will please.”

In 35 years, progress?

“There are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content. That, I think about covers the ground.” Fred Rodell, Goodbye to Law Reviews, 23 Va. L. Rev. 38, 38 (1936–1937) “Legal writing by federal judges and the lawyers who appear before them is today generally serviceable, in the sense of being pretty clearly written, pretty careful, businesslike, grammatical.” Richard A. Posner, Legal Writing Today, 8 Scribes J. Leg. Writing 35, 35 (2001–2002) (emphasis in original).