Blog Archives

Top Ten Appellate Mistakes – Failing to Tell the Judges Why They Should Care

Many attorneys who believe that they have controlling precedent on their side gleefully approach appellate briefs with the strong conviction that an appeal to the law will cause truth and justice to rain down and the trial court’s incorrect decision

Posted in Uncategorized

Why You Cannot Spot Typos in Your Own Work

Writing is mianly about maening. In an interview with Wired, University of Sheffield psychologist Tom Stafford explained: “When you’re writing, you’re trying to convey meaning. It’s a very high level task.” A writer who leaves a lot of typos on

Posted in Uncategorized

Top Ten Appellate Mistakes – Motion for Reconsideration

Did you know that in Pennsylvania, filing a Motion for Reconsideration does not toll the 30-day period for the filing of a Notice of Appeal?  Neither do lots of attorneys.  Check out my video

Posted in Uncategorized

Waiver of Legal Arguments on Appeal

Faithful readers of this blog are aware of my criticism of the overuse of “waiver” by appellate courts. The first problem is that the term “waiver” is technically incorrect; “forfeiture” is actually the correct one. “Waiver” means something slightly different,

Posted in Uncategorized

Third Circuit narrowly defines “distribution” of child pornography

Thanks to my efforts, in United States v. Husmann, 765 F.3d 169 (3d Cir. 2014), the Third Circuit overturned the conviction of a man found guilty of distribution of child pornography because the government could not prove that the images

Posted in Uncategorized

Ten Top Appellate Mistakes

The practice of law has become specialized, and a jack of all trades typically is a master of none.  Judge Silberman of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia warns, “Effective presentation to a federal court

Posted in Uncategorized

Waiver in the Pennsylvania Superior Court

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of practicing before the Pennsylvania Superior Court is its application of the doctrine of waiver. Or should I say “over-application.” The federal courts have frequently held that they will not consider issues not passed on

Posted in Uncategorized

Hobby Lobby and its discontents

Anyone who has actually read the Supreme Court’s opinion in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby knows that the decision is quite narrow. The Court granted certiorari to determine whether HHS regulations requiring that corporations offer certain forms of birth control violate

Posted in Uncategorized

Word Crimes

While I am in my kynetic typography silly season, I couldn’t help but direct your attention to Weird Al’s “Word Crimes” video:  

Posted in Uncategorized

The Impotence of Proofreading

While I’m on a kinetic typography kick, I thought I might share an amusing video that demonstrates the difficulty of proofreading one’s own work, even with spell check.  The narrator’s voice is annoying, but his message is clear.   One

Posted in Uncategorized

To blog of legalese

“The time has come,” the lawyer said,
“To blog of legalese:
Of headings—and quotes—and citations—
Of orders and decrees—
And why law prose is frightfully dull—
And whether the brief will please.”

In 35 years, progress?

“There are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content. That, I think about covers the ground.” Fred Rodell, Goodbye to Law Reviews, 23 Va. L. Rev. 38, 38 (1936–1937) “Legal writing by federal judges and the lawyers who appear before them is today generally serviceable, in the sense of being pretty clearly written, pretty careful, businesslike, grammatical.” Richard A. Posner, Legal Writing Today, 8 Scribes J. Leg. Writing 35, 35 (2001–2002) (emphasis in original).