The Comic Book Brief

“One picture is worth ten thousand words.”

This familiar maxim was coined (according to the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations) by Frederick R. Barnard, in the publication “Printers Ink” on March 10, 1927. It is not a Chinese proverb. It is, however, particularly applicable to legal briefs, into which thousands of words are daily spilled.

One brief writer, ordered to limit his brief to five pages, hired a graphic illustrator to create a “graphic novelette,” which takes jabs at the judge for demanding that such complex issues be reduced to five pages. The clerk accepted it for filing, but the judge ignored it.

Here it is:

pennsylvania appellate lawyer attorney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania appellate lawyer attorney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania appellate lawyer attorney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania appellate lawyer attorney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania appellate lawyer attorney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania appellate attorney lawyer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The full brief may downloaded in PDF form here: comic book brief

It reminds me of the “Classics Illustrated” comic book versions of great literature that I read in my youth.  But a whole lot more amusing.

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

To blog of legalese

“The time has come,” the lawyer said,
“To blog of legalese:
Of headings—and quotes—and citations—
Of orders and decrees—
And why law prose is frightfully dull—
And whether the brief will please.”

In 35 years, progress?

“There are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content. That, I think about covers the ground.” Fred Rodell, Goodbye to Law Reviews, 23 Va. L. Rev. 38, 38 (1936–1937) “Legal writing by federal judges and the lawyers who appear before them is today generally serviceable, in the sense of being pretty clearly written, pretty careful, businesslike, grammatical.” Richard A. Posner, Legal Writing Today, 8 Scribes J. Leg. Writing 35, 35 (2001–2002) (emphasis in original).